<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarios en: Blogs as community killers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/</link>
	<description>Community buiding. Knowledge management. Social IT. Shaken, not stirred.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Por: Library clips :: How relevant are communities of practice in a network age? :: February :: 2009</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-4130</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: How relevant are communities of practice in a network age? :: February :: 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>[...] it did happen to KnowledgeBoard. Once blogs came on the scene, people participated in forums less frequently, and blogged from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it did happen to KnowledgeBoard. Once blogs came on the scene, people participated in forums less frequently, and blogged from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Library clips :: Networks, Communities and Aggregation :: February :: 2008</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-3883</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Networks, Communities and Aggregation :: February :: 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 05:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-3883</guid>
		<description>[...] agree that the new individual centric networked web has wooed people from communities and forums, as people like the freedom of their own soapbox, there are no restrictions or rules and you simply [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] agree that the new individual centric networked web has wooed people from communities and forums, as people like the freedom of their own soapbox, there are no restrictions or rules and you simply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Hi Cindy,

very nice to see you here :-). How&#039;s everything?

That&#039;s two key issues you raised there: how the blog&#039;s reader &quot;community&quot; interacts with the pre-existing community (once commenting there is allowed, how interactions shift), and the control issue, which changes radically when blogs interact with the old structure.

This experiment is being quite interesting :-). Best regards,

Miguel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cindy,</p>
<p>very nice to see you here <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . How&#8217;s everything?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s two key issues you raised there: how the blog&#8217;s reader &#8220;community&#8221; interacts with the pre-existing community (once commenting there is allowed, how interactions shift), and the control issue, which changes radically when blogs interact with the old structure.</p>
<p>This experiment is being quite interesting <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Best regards,</p>
<p>Miguel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: cindy</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 09:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Hello Miguel,

Nice place! I even managed to learn a few new Spanish words such ac Correo, enviar comentario! 

Blogs as a community killers -- what a topic. I would say yes. Blog came from the US. US is the most individualistic society. What do you expect? Community advocates collective livings. Which is in oposition to individualism. 

But then again, depends on the kind of blogs. As long as the blog does not touch on anything to do with human behaviours, that blog can be neutral. Anything neutral would not pull-the-community-apart. But as we know, most blogs allow comments, and that if not control could create problems. 

Control is the key. We somehow has the romantic ideas that, let&#039;s creat a space, let&#039;s come and share ideas. That would not work. If we want to have continuos flow of ideas, activities etc. there has to be control. Control in this sense is more about regulations ... regulate where, when, how, why and what. If there is no control, things would just fall into pieces. Just like a plot of land. If you want to turn it into a garden and wishes it to stay a garden forever ... what would you do? 

Cindy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Miguel,</p>
<p>Nice place! I even managed to learn a few new Spanish words such ac Correo, enviar comentario! </p>
<p>Blogs as a community killers &#8212; what a topic. I would say yes. Blog came from the US. US is the most individualistic society. What do you expect? Community advocates collective livings. Which is in oposition to individualism. </p>
<p>But then again, depends on the kind of blogs. As long as the blog does not touch on anything to do with human behaviours, that blog can be neutral. Anything neutral would not pull-the-community-apart. But as we know, most blogs allow comments, and that if not control could create problems. </p>
<p>Control is the key. We somehow has the romantic ideas that, let&#8217;s creat a space, let&#8217;s come and share ideas. That would not work. If we want to have continuos flow of ideas, activities etc. there has to be control. Control in this sense is more about regulations &#8230; regulate where, when, how, why and what. If there is no control, things would just fall into pieces. Just like a plot of land. If you want to turn it into a garden and wishes it to stay a garden forever &#8230; what would you do? </p>
<p>Cindy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon,

we had that opportunity with Invision (they do a blog component for their forum software along those lines) but the collaborators voted it down. Several times. They fear it would take the conversations away from the forums.

Still, there may be a channel issue there: email and web navigation are not so linked as forums and web navigation. Maybe that&#039;s a reason most of your members are not taking up the offer, and most mailing list&#039;s portals don&#039;t thrive.

Re the middle ground you suggest, that would amount to integrating the independent blog with the community portal (more or less closely). That&#039;s something that could work, I think. But, if there&#039;s no payment or contract involved, there&#039;s a certain risk of assymetry: either the portal is promoting the author, or the author is promoting the portal (or they&#039;re both good enough and the issue is not relevant). It needs a lot of good faith and trust to do it (which is not saying it can&#039;t be done :-)).

Thanks for your opinion and experience (and please keep up the news :-)).

Best regards,

Miguel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>we had that opportunity with Invision (they do a blog component for their forum software along those lines) but the collaborators voted it down. Several times. They fear it would take the conversations away from the forums.</p>
<p>Still, there may be a channel issue there: email and web navigation are not so linked as forums and web navigation. Maybe that&#8217;s a reason most of your members are not taking up the offer, and most mailing list&#8217;s portals don&#8217;t thrive.</p>
<p>Re the middle ground you suggest, that would amount to integrating the independent blog with the community portal (more or less closely). That&#8217;s something that could work, I think. But, if there&#8217;s no payment or contract involved, there&#8217;s a certain risk of assymetry: either the portal is promoting the author, or the author is promoting the portal (or they&#8217;re both good enough and the issue is not relevant). It needs a lot of good faith and trust to do it (which is not saying it can&#8217;t be done <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
<p>Thanks for your opinion and experience (and please keep up the news <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Miguel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Jon Ford</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 15:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Miguel,

Perhaps there is a fertile middle ground in the creation of multi-author blogs? We are working on/with the adoption of a third party community site. On that software platform, each member is entitled to a personal blog if they so choose.

Nothing substantive enough to report yet on how that is going. Or maybe there is: so far, many folks are using just the listserv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miguel,</p>
<p>Perhaps there is a fertile middle ground in the creation of multi-author blogs? We are working on/with the adoption of a third party community site. On that software platform, each member is entitled to a personal blog if they so choose.</p>
<p>Nothing substantive enough to report yet on how that is going. Or maybe there is: so far, many folks are using just the listserv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: DARnet &#187; Blogs as community killers</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>DARnet &#187; Blogs as community killers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 11:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2007/05/09/blogs-as-community-killers/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] relating to listservs. I read it in my email, from a subscription to the com-prac yahoogroup. Blogs as community killers? « eme ká eme Blogs as community killers? 9 05 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] relating to listservs. I read it in my email, from a subscription to the com-prac yahoogroup. Blogs as community killers? « eme ká eme Blogs as community killers? 9 05 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
