<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarios en: Tag surfing for KM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/tag-surfing-for-km/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/tag-surfing-for-km/</link>
	<description>Community buiding. Knowledge management. Social IT. Shaken, not stirred.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Por: crossderry</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/tag-surfing-for-km/#comment-3770</link>
		<dc:creator>crossderry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/tag-surfing-for-km/#comment-3770</guid>
		<description>Hi Miguel,
Thanks for the kind words...I&#039;ve linked to your blog.  I like the emphasis you place on business impact.

One of the reasons I like the &quot;sense:nonsense&quot; construct is that it brings into play a different dimension vs. &quot;signal to noise.&quot;  By considering whether one&#039;s sense or nonsense is shared with the competition, &quot;sense:nonsense&quot; gives insights int strategy.  Of course, one could extend &quot;signal to noise&quot; to include whether one has a better signal booster (or noise reducer) than one&#039;s competition.

Best,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Miguel,<br />
Thanks for the kind words&#8230;I&#8217;ve linked to your blog.  I like the emphasis you place on business impact.</p>
<p>One of the reasons I like the &#8220;sense:nonsense&#8221; construct is that it brings into play a different dimension vs. &#8220;signal to noise.&#8221;  By considering whether one&#8217;s sense or nonsense is shared with the competition, &#8220;sense:nonsense&#8221; gives insights int strategy.  Of course, one could extend &#8220;signal to noise&#8221; to include whether one has a better signal booster (or noise reducer) than one&#8217;s competition.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: KM &#38; CoP Blog &#8212; http://emekaeme.wordpress.com &#171; Crossderry Blog</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/tag-surfing-for-km/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>KM &#38; CoP Blog &#8212; http://emekaeme.wordpress.com &#171; Crossderry Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/tag-surfing-for-km/#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments crossderry on Socializing PMO&#160;MetricsKelly Stuart on Socializing PMO&#160;MetricsTag surfing for KM ... on KM to surface management innov...Tag surfing for KM ... on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments crossderry on Socializing PMO&nbsp;MetricsKelly Stuart on Socializing PMO&nbsp;MetricsTag surfing for KM &#8230; on KM to surface management innov&#8230;Tag surfing for KM &#8230; on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
