<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentarios en: Some open innovation and crowdsourcing examples</title>
	<atom:link href="http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/some-open-innovation-and-crowdsourcing-examples/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/some-open-innovation-and-crowdsourcing-examples/</link>
	<description>Community buiding. Knowledge management. Social IT. Shaken, not stirred.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Por: Lucas Rodriguez Cervera</title>
		<link>http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/some-open-innovation-and-crowdsourcing-examples/#comment-4001</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas Rodriguez Cervera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emekaeme.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/some-open-innovation-and-crowdsourcing-examples/#comment-4001</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reference to Open Procedures Miguel. 

I would like to comment that we are always thinking about new ways in which colaborators can monetize their contents, although we beleive that this is better achieved through services (some colaborators offer professional services if you want to implement processes designed by them) than through direct content sales (we see this business model as a less sustainable one).

And also, content is released under a Creative Commons Attribution license and you are free to use the content in anyway you like provided that you mention who the author is. This means that there&#039;s no lock in. You only pay if you want to use our software to manage the information, but if you want to manage that information in another platform you are 100% free to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reference to Open Procedures Miguel. </p>
<p>I would like to comment that we are always thinking about new ways in which colaborators can monetize their contents, although we beleive that this is better achieved through services (some colaborators offer professional services if you want to implement processes designed by them) than through direct content sales (we see this business model as a less sustainable one).</p>
<p>And also, content is released under a Creative Commons Attribution license and you are free to use the content in anyway you like provided that you mention who the author is. This means that there&#8217;s no lock in. You only pay if you want to use our software to manage the information, but if you want to manage that information in another platform you are 100% free to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
